Parliamentary Committee Seeks Expert Input on Landmark UK Cyber Security Legislation

Parliamentary Committee Seeks Expert Input on Landmark UK Cyber Security Legislation
LONDON—The UK's cybersecurity overhaul hits a crucial stage. Parliamentary officials are pleading with security experts: we urgently need your insights on the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill (CSRB). Why the rush? This bill isn't just tweaking rules—it’s rebuilding how the nation protects energy grids, transport networks, and digital systems.
Legislative Background and Progression
Call it the long-awaited upgrade to the 2018 NIS Regulations. Inspired by the EU’s NIS2 Directive, the CSRB kicked off in the 2024 King’s Speech targeting vital sectors. After clearing its second reading, it’s now in committee scrutiny—where every technical detail gets picked apart. So what happens next?
Urgent Call for Industry Engagement
Here’s the reality: The Public Bill Committee’s practically begging for expert input. They want organizations with "relevant expertise" to submit evidence ASAP. Oral hearings start February 3 and could run through March, but don’t drag your feet:
"Seriously, get those written submissions in quick. The committee might finish early and lock things down before the deadline."
They’ll wrap their report by March 5, pushing the bill toward its third Commons reading. After Lords review this spring/summer, Royal Assent should land late 2026.
Unlike other thorny policies, this cybersecurity push has cross-party support—so industry voices genuinely matter. The question isn’t if it’ll pass, but how practical it’ll be for professionals on the ground.
Core Legislative Upgrades
So what’s actually changing? The CSRB drives five major shifts:
- Broader Regulatory Scope: MSPs, data centres, even electric-car charging operators! More sectors could get added later.
- Enhanced Incident Reporting: You’ll need to report breaches faster—and report more kinds.
- Supply Chain Accountability: Gotta vet your third-party suppliers proactively.
- Security Benchmarking: Compliance aligns with NCSC’s Cyber Assessment Framework—security can’t be outdated.
- Regulator Empowerment: Watchdogs get sharper teeth and penalties that’ll hurt.
It’s all about deflecting attacks that keep evolving—from ransomware to state-sponsored hacks.
Industry Perspectives: Praises and Pitfalls
Security experts cheer the consultation but flag gaps. Jonathan Lee, UK Cybersecurity Director at Trend Micro, nailed it:
"Talking to the frontline is non-negotiable—but consult widely! Don’t just hear big tech. SMEs, MSPs, incident responders? They’ve got skin in this game."
He highlighted undefined "risk-based" aspects: Who exactly counts as a crucial supplier? How do we stop a flood of useless incident reports? Lee pushed regulators to harmonize requirements and offer cost-saving incentives.
Legal specialist Mark Bailey, Partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, agreed:
“They’ve punted crucial details—like incident thresholds and MSP rules—to future legislation. We won’t see technical specifics until after consultations."
These open questions are exactly why expert evidence matters now. Without real-world feedback, rules might arrive impossible to follow—or buried in red tape.
Path Forward
Stakeholders are racing against the clock: written evidence shapes regulations before March 5. Input will define how Ofcom and the ICO enforce penalties and sector rules. Cleverly, the CSRB avoids overlapping GDPR by laser-focusing on critical infrastructure.
You’ll find submission guides on the parliamentary portal. As Lee stressed, this bills will shape UK cyber defenses for decades. Honestly? With attacks crippling hospitals, banks, and power networks—there’s zero time to lose.



